Tuesday, December 22, 2015

The railroad approved and other wristwatch reviews.

If you need the official time go to www.time.gov
Note: The pictures are clickable!

The Railroad Approved Citizen
BF0050-51A
Specs:
Stainless Steel
Day/Date
Water Resistant
Mineral Crystal
Japan Quartz Movement
2 year battery
Price: Around $70

This watch is small, about 33mm by 7. It's very light and the low profile makes it slide easily under sleeves. The steel bracelet has a folding clasp and is very comfortable. The dial and hands are clearly legible in daylight. At night however, it's a different story. The lumabrite spots in the dial show up nicely, but the hands are so narrow you really cannot see them. The hands are also to short. the minute hand should extend to the minute markers and it doesn't. The second hand should also. It doesn't either. The crystal is flush with the bezel so it gets a bit of protection from scratches. Thats a good thing. It is listed as water resistant, a theory I wouldn't want to test since it has a snap on back and the crown doesn't screw down. The day and date can be difficult to read at times, they don't always line up in the window. The watch has a simple, no jewel movement that gains about 8 seconds a month. That's about what I would expect. This is a good watch for comfort, you hardly know it's there, but the poor choice of hands can get on the nerves.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Railroad Approved Seiko Seiko SGG531
Specs:
Stainless Steel
Day/Date
Water Resistant to 50 meters
Mineral Crystal
Japan Quartz Movement
5 year battery
Price Around $100

This watch is a bit larger than the Citizen, it's 36mm by 8mm. It is very light as well, it almost feels fake. The bracelet is also comfortable with an easy to use folding clasp. The dial and hands is where this watch really shines. Like the Citizen the numbers are clearly legible, although I like the Font on the Citizen better. The hands are the proper length so the correct time is seen at a glance. In the dark, the Lumabrite spots and hands show up perfectly. Citizen could learn from this. The hands aren't perfect though. They are chrome and under certain light, they reflect and almost disappear into the background. I think blue or black would have been a better choice. The day and date line up perfectly, and they are more legible than the Citizen as well. Another nice point of this watch is the movement. It's a simple single jewel movement but it's accuracy is terrific. I measured a gain of just 2 to 3 seconds a month! I have concerns about the crystal, it actually sticks above the bezel a bit so it's completely unprotected. Being a mineral crystal, it can be scratched fairly easily, but not easily buffed out. I wish they would use plastic or Sapphire instead. The watch claims 50 meters water resistance and the screw down back helps. The crown doesn't screw down however, but for $100 bucks you cannot ask for too much.

There you have it.
Now, for comfort the Citizen, at least to me has a slight edge, the lower profile, nicer font, and more rounded case give it a bit more style also. The Seiko has an easy edge in legibility and it's superb accuracy. Also, the extra water resistance of the Seiko is a great advantage as well. Both bands are equally easy to use, and seem to pull on the arm hairs equally too! If you're clumsy, the better protected Citizen crystal is worth considering. Personally, I think the Seiko is worth the extra 30 bucks. Pulsar, also by Seiko also has some, but I didn't have any to review.
Time for something different....

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chase Durer Special Forces 1000 UDT
Specs:
316L Stainless Steel
Chronograph/Date
Water resistant 330 meters!
Sapphire Crystal
ETA 251.262 Quartz Movement
3 year battery
Price Around $500 This watch is discontinued, replaced by an even BIGGER one.

This watch is big. 42mm by 14mm. And heavy. Over 1/3 pound! The dial is busy, with a chronograph function measuring up to 12 hours at 1/10 second. There are 7 hands plus date and tachymetre surrounded by a left turn only bezel that has a 360 deg. compass heading and the minutes marked off in fives. Believe it or not, this watch is easier to read at night since only the hour markers and numbers along with the hour and minute hand glow, thus rendering the whole view simpler. The Superluminova used to make the glow works very well. Very bright at first, it dims at about the rate your eyes adjust to the dark so it helps preserve night vision.
The movement has 27 jewels which seems like overkill on a quartz watch, but it shows ETA cares. One very nice feature of this movement is that you can change the hour hand without stopping the minutes. While only taking slightly longer for date changes, it makes changing timezones and daylight savings a snap. My watch gains a bit over 6 seconds a month which is good but it seems like it ought to be better at this price point.
I wore this watch two years straight and there is not one scratch on the sapphire crystal. That's tough stuff. In fact the only wear this watch shows is on the pointy parts of the bezel, and at the clasp. The water resistance is a remarkable 1000 feet. It's believeable too. The Crown, pushers, and back all screw down. Of course, while this watch is certainly tough, I didn't wear it while I was fixing the car or doing anything to risky. It's just the sheer price of the thing that makes one want to baby it. All isn't perfect of course. I believe the bezel should count down instead of up since you have an excellent chronograph for that. And the weight is finally what caused me to put it away. In order to keep it from bouncing on my wrist bone, or rubbing a hot spot in my wrist, I'd have to wear it very tight, then my hand would start to go to sleep. Who knew?
Still, this is one watch that seems to say Mack Bolin every time I see it. You know, it's just bad ass.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Citizen Stiletto watch #AR0010-02A
Specs:
Stainless Steel
Shows the time only, thinness has a price.
Water resistant
Sapphire Crystal
Eco-Drive Quartz
Solar Powered
Price Around $150 This watch is discontinued, replaced by an even thinner one!

If you like your watches seen and not felt, this is a good choice. Very light and thin with a thin leather band, you'll hardly know it's there. This watch is only just over 5mm thick and 33mm across. If you buy it's replacement, you lose the second hand and drop to 4mm! Citizen claims these are the thinnest solar powered watches you can buy. The movement isn't just very thin, less than 3mm, but very small, the solar panel isn't between it and the dial, but actually surrounds it, like a doughnut.
Don't dunk it in water though, it's slim size means basically only splash resistance, no screw down crown, and only a snap on back. The Sapphire crystal, a terrific feature at this price, helps to ensure a scratch free view of the dial. I might add that it is one nice dial, bright white with very black indicators and hands. It's easy to read, with no clutter. Light is this watches' friend. It's where it gets it's power, and the only way you can see it. Nothing glows. It is a dress watch. It is estimated the rechargeable cell should last 15 to 25 years. Accurate to about 8 seconds a month, I've been very happy with this one.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Casio G-Shock DW-5600E
Specs:
Reinforced Resin Case
Day/Date/Month
Alarms/Stopwatch/
Timer/etc.
Water Resistant 200 meters
Seriously Shock Resistant
Mineral Glass Crystal
Quartz Module/LCD
Battery 2 to 3 years.
Price Around $40

Chances are you've all seen one. This watch has been a favorite of soldiers, police, and anybody else who needs a watch that just works, whatever you're doing. With no moving parts, and a module encased in rubber, inside a hard plastic case, protected by yet another plastic shell, these watches are about as close to indestructible as you can get. All this while remaining very light on the wrist. The use of mineral glass can be debated, sapphire would be preferred, but I'm told sapphire is more brittle than glass, thus more likely to shatter on impact. I'm more inclined to believe it keeps cost down.
The beauty of these watches is that you don't have to think about them. You buy one new, you abuse it a bit, after awhile you realize it's fine. You can do whatever you'd do if you weren't wearing a watch. Water is no problem, neither is engine oil, "don't ask", You can even use the buttons while submerged. This model is the bottom of the line, and it's as tough as the rest. One chief complaint about the DW-5600E is that it keeps lousy time. Often true. this one gained 25 seconds a month. I've heard of them gaining as much as 2 minutes a month. Not acceptable for a quartz watch.
One little known secret about this particular model. The rate is Adjustable. Seriously, you have to remove the back, like you'd do to change the battery, and just above the all clear contact there is a screw. Takes a tiny flat tip, turn it clockwise to slow it down, and counter-clockwise to speed it up. After a few tries, I got mine down to a gain of just under 1 second a month! Not to shabby. Here's a somewhat lousy pic. The blurry arrow at the top points to the correct screw...

With plastic cases, these watches are going to show wear. They'll get shiny as the plastic wears, the bands will get brittle and need replacing, the glass will get scratched, but they will still likely survive better than you. At least until the year 2039, when this models' calendar reaches the end of it's programming!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VOSTOK Komandirskie Submarine Military Watch

Specs:
Chrome Case/Steel Back
Date
Shock Resistant
Water Resistant 50 meters
Plastic Crystal
17 Jewel Manual Wind
Approx 36 hours running
Price Around $50

Vostok Watch factory in Russia has been making watches since 1942. This particular watch was made shortly before the fall of Communism. They still make basically this same watch today. It is low priced, but very solid. This one isn't shown with the original band. Size wise it's about 38mm by 9mm. A good guy's sized watch, without being overdone. It is a bit hefty. Lot's of metal here. The back has a very ingenious screw down method that doesn't damage the seal. You can see it in the picture. The crown also screws down. This is one of the pleasures of this watch. The crown is very big and easy to get a grip on. You can quickly unscrew and wind it then screw it back down with no fuss. It's a good thing since it's not an auto wind. The upside here is that it keeps the watch relatively thin. The auto wind version is several mm thicker.
The simple 17 jewel movement is undecorated, so having no window in the back isn't a loss. Undecorated however, doesn't mean cheap. The design is very robust, and while the watch is rated at a lousy -20 to +60 seconds daily, it can be considerably more accurate. I have this one adjusted to a rate of -2 to -3 seconds daily on the wrist. A variation of just 1 second is not bad for any mechanical. It does considerably better than my Seiko divers with it's 7S26 Automatic movement. It's rate can very over 10 seconds a day!
Comfort wise the design could have been better. It's bottom edges are a bit sharp and can sometimes dig into the arm, the crown sometimes leaves a mark as well. The crystal is raised and exposed, but since it's plastic, if you scratch it you can usually buff it out with no trouble. The dial and hands aren't going to win any style awards, but they are easy to read. The bezel turns both directions with no clicks. The luminous part on this watch doesn't glow anymore, but when it did it was very easy to read in the dark. I imagine it's just as good it doesn't glow anymore, they used some pretty radioactive stuff back then. All in all, if you are on a tight budget, but want a good mechanical, these watches shouldn't be overlooked.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A quick review of my old Rolex DateJust
I recieved this watch from my dad when I was 14. He picked it up in Hong Kong in 1966. I was just 2. Dad was in the infantry during the Korean and Vietnam wars. This watch has seen considerable abuse. I wore it a solid 20 years before putting it into semi-retirement. It's 100 meters water resistant using their famous Oyster case and Twinlock crown. It has a Swiss in house automatic COSC certified movement.
While he only paid $200 for it back then, one would have to pay over $6000 to replace it now. Rolex still doesn't seem to have any trouble selling them. My experience with this one has given me nothing but respect for the brand. It's always been accurate, with a variation of no more than 1 to 2 seconds a day. It still looks new, although the crystal has been replaced several times. This one has a plastic crystal so it isn't too expensive. The Crown has been replaced twice. Last time it cost $90. I imagine it will be much more now. In an odd turn, the Crown goes bad because it's Gold, and gold is soft, so the threads wear out. If it had been a much cheaper steel crown it would have lasted considerably longer! The case is 316L stainless. Rolex uses a better steel now. They also have switched to Sapphire crystals.
Incidently, the watch is currently being serviced, something I try to do every 10 years. It will cost more to service it than it cost to BUY any of the other watches I have reviewed so far. That is a fac
tor to consider.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Monday, December 21, 2015

2015 HP Pavilion 15t Touch (Skylake!)

A Look at the HP Pavilion 15t Touch (Skylake)
Top View HP Pavilion 15t in Cobalt Blue
Some Specs:
OS: Windows 10 home 64
Processor: Intel I5 6200U @ 2.0GHz
Graphics: Intel HD Graphics 520
Ram: 8 G DDR3L 1DIMM
HD: 1TB 5400 rpm Hard Drive
Optical: SuperMulti DVD burner
Battery: 4-cell 41WHr (Lasts easy 4hrs)
Wireless: Intel 802.11 ac WLAN with Bluetooth
HD Webcam with dual digital Mikes
Display 15.6in Full HD WLED IPS at
  (1920x1080) Touchscreen
Color: (Optional) Cobalt Blue


A word on those specs...
     I didn't have this thing a week before I had it opened up and added a 2nd stick of RAM making it Run Dual Channel and upping the total to 16 GB. While I had it opened I went ahead and swapped the Big and SLOW 5400 rpm Hard Drive for a smaller and FASTER 250GB Crucial MX200 SSD.
     Once you've used a Solid State Drive you can never go back. Never.

That said, here is a look at the bottom...

Bottom View HP Pavilion 15t
    Anything missing? Yep. No access ports. That is the reason I almost didn't buy this machine. But the price was just too good to pass up. In retrospect, I'm glad I got it because opening it up isn't as hard as it looks. Just takes patience, a Philips, and a credit/debit card to get it open without mangling it.
First, remove Battery
2nd , remove ALL the screws. (16)
3rd, pop off the hinge covers and lift the palmrest from the back by prying the edges with the plastic of your choice. You have the pry the front and sides up. Then once the bottom is free, push it back towards the monitor and it'll pop loose. Then it looks like this...


Internal View HP Pavilion 15t
    Now you have access to everything you can replace. Ram, HD, Wireless card, and that's about it. Processor is soldered on so make sure you get it with the one you want! In this case I got it with the baseline Intel I5. The 6200U here is the bottom of Intel's Low Voltage I5 line. It has 2 cores, 4 threads, and 3MB Cache. It runs at 2.2GHz with a Turbo Boost to 2.7GHz when needed. This processor is only 15W due to 14nm Lithography. For being low end it's extremely quick and easy on the battery. I think for general use you won't have any complaints. Notebookcheck.net has a very good article describing this processors' specs and performance.
Now if you plan to use a laptop for gaming I'd go for an ACTUAL QUAD CORE. You'd want to look at the HQ series if you're sticking with Intel. They have 4 cores and more cache. They also use a lot more watts! Shorter battery life and busier fan, but higher framerates is the reward. Now on another note, here is a look at the keyboard.

Light off...
It's a nice keyboard, easy to use with very positive clicks. Maybe a bit too "clicky". Gets a bit loud when you're typing fast. I use a business version HP laptop at work and the keyboard is absolutely silent. I think I prefer it. But this'll do. Also, I got it with the somewhat spendy backlight option since I often type in low or no light at home. It's cool, useful, 30 bucks, and it looks like this...

Light on:-)





Here are a few more pictures to show other laptop details.


Great Sound!
Exhaust side...
Playa side..

    So far, I've been very happy with this laptop. Goofy Cobalt Blue and all. (It often gets confused with the HP stream because of the color). With the Monitor upgrade, Wifi card upgrade, and keyboard upgrade it was still under $600 on sale; then again the extra 8GB of ram and the Crucial SSD added another $120. However, I was able to take the pokey 1TB HD it came with and put it in a cheap external usb enclosure and now I also have a bonus backup drive as well:-)
  HP's software allows you to save one image of your HD for backup or upgrades. I saved it to a USB key but did not use it when I did the SSD upgrade. I just loaded Windows 10 from Microsoft's website and found the rest of the needed drivers on HP's own very helpful website. No sweat and the bloatware is gone!
  Remember!! if you do the upgrade yourself, be sure to find ALL those screws before you pry the back off. 10 are obvious, but the other 6 not so much. 2 are UNDER the hinge covers, 2 are at about the center UNDER thin plastic plugs, and 2 are BEHIND the DVD drive door. As far as the Ram upgrade goes, 8GB really is the sweet spot. But using only 1 stick causes it to run in single channel mode which can be a significant performance hit. If HP had used two 4GB sticks instead of one 8GB stick I wouldn't have bothered to upgrade the Ram.
    If there are any serious decisions to be made when ordering the laptop it's what screen. I always go for the higher resolution a no brainer at 20 bucks and it just makes the screen more useful. Also, think hard on the processor. A Celeron might be attractive pricewise, but check the benchmarks, they really are very slow. The Pentiums are a bit faster, but lack most of the instructions (MMX, SSE to SSE4, AES, EM64T, etc.) so it can really slow them down as well. The lowest I'd go is an I3. A bit less cache and no turbo boost, but it runs the instructions in hardware like the I5 and I7.
    So if your on the fence about one of these Pavilion Laptops I believe they are worth a whirl. After all HP gives you 30 days to return it if you find it doesn't work for you. 






Sunday, December 20, 2015

Sherwood RX-4105 vs Yamaha R-S201BL. Sorry about the poor pics. My camera needs glasses.


Sherwood RX-4105

A few specs:
Power Output at 40HZ to 20KHZ 2x105W at 8 ohms.
THD is 0.04%
Frequency response 10Hz~100kHz
Base/Treble 100Hz/20kHz is + or - 10dB
Weight 19.85 lbs. Hefty!
INPUTS 4, CD, TAPE, TV/AUX,VCR-Really?
COMPLETE SPECS can be found:
www.sherwoodusa.com





Here are a couple nudies...
 This Sherwood sells for around $100. Honestly it's a lot of receiver for the money. Besides the volume knob the front panel is all buttons. Very few options here. Base and Treble, no loudness. There is no phono preamp, the speaker binding posts are all spring loaded. It's just a 2 channel analogue receiver. A couple nice items to mention though you can actually turn off the entire display with the dimmer on the remote, and you can bypass your base and treble adjustments with the tone direct button (from the panel only). The remote is simple to use, but only works for the Sherwood. You cannot use it for anything else.  


If you buy the upgraded RX-4109, about another $25, you get better speaker binding posts, tone controls on the remote (nice), and a phono preamp. Otherwise I think they are the same. This Sherwood is solid. I've used this receiver almost daily for over 8 years with no issues. It has always been with 1 pair of 8 ohm speakers though. I hear they can run very hot with 6 ohm or less. It is very heavy.





Yamaha R-S201BL

A few specs:
Power Output at 40HZ to 20KHZ 2x100W at 8 ohms.
THD is 0.2%
Frequency response
 10Hz~100kHz
Base/Treble
 50Hz/20kHz is + or - 10dB
Weight 14.8 lbs.
INPUTS 4, CD, Line1, Line2, Line3
COMPLETE SPECS can be found:
usa.yamaha.com



A couple topless pics...
This Yamaha sells for around $150. It has very similar
features to the Sherwood. Similar power rating, same number of inputs, it's 2 channel analogue. It doesn't weigh as much (The power supply is smaller). And, like the Sherwood, besides volume the front panel is all push-button. Unlike the Sherwood, you can dim the display, but not turn it off. There is no bypass for the tone controls either. On the upside though, this receiver will eventually turn it'self off if you forget to. The Sherwood won't do that. The remote is simple, it DOES have tone controls and if you happen to have a Yamaha CD player it'll control that too.

 If you buy the upgraded R-S300 it'll Cost another $100, yikes! but it gets, strangely, only 50 watts a channel, knobs instead of buttons (I don't consider that a plus), variable loudness (nice), Top-ART construction (whatever that is), an Ipod dock, Pure Direct which seems similar to the Sherwood with Display off and Tone Direct selected, And an Aluminum front panel. (Both of these stereos have plastic panels.




Yamaha output Transistors
Here are some more revealing pics. These are just some comparison shots for the gearheads.
Sherwood Caps
Sherwood Output Transistors
Yamaha Caps


Yamaha and Sherwood Rear.
So, if you were to just look at the specs, or pick them up, or judge by size, you might think the Sherwood would sound better. It's what I figured, but it looks like I was wrong. The Sherwood sounds pretty good with network TV. And not bad with Very well recorded CD's. But when the recording is less than perfect, or if the music gets complex like maybe rock, or orchestra, the sound seems to get somewhat blended together. You lose definition and range, hard to explain, The sound just flattens; maybe it's best to stick with nice simple jazz, it likes that. It has a very forward sound in the first place. You could read that as lots of midrange and not a lot of stereo separation. For purists the Sherwood has the Tone Direct button, but I defy you to use it. This thing just needs some tone adjustments. The Bass can go up to 10 in increments of 2, it'll get louder but  also muddier as you go. I found 6 to be about the best compromise with the speakers I was using. The treble I could go to 4 at most because it gets pretty shrill beyond that.
    The Yamaha on the other hand, has a very detailed sound. You know what is playing and where. It's not detailed in the way that say an Onkyo sounds (ultra accurate), but a little bit more like a tube amp,  Making that hard edged sound you get from a CD sound a bit like vinyl, all there but smoother. Where with the Sherwood I'm tired of listening after a few hours, I can leave the Yamaha on all day. Turning up the tone controls on the Yamaha makes the base/treble sound closer instead of louder (Bass keeps it's punch and treble gets clearer, a neat effect). A simple way to put it would maybe be the Sherwood sounds like a stereo playing music but the Yamaha sounds almost like being there.
        They say with a little luck you get what you pay for. I'd say that's true with the Sherwood. Mine has been solid and reliable. The Yamaha has basically the same abilities for $50 more. Is the Yamaha worth it? If your ears have a vote, they'd say "yes".  
Google